Todd's Blog

Todd's Tips for System Adminstrators

  • TechDays
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Contact Me
  • About Me

Connect

  • LinkedIn

Powered by Genesis

Windows 7 – The Lineup is Released

posted on February 3, 2009

Microsoft announced their Windows 7 lineup today. The plan for Windows 7 is to promote 2 main versions in North America, Professional and Home Premium, but the other versions will be there as well.

The versions being offered are as follows and the points listed are my interpretation of the what I read in the article.

  • Starter – Only available to OEM’s.
  • Home Basic – Not available in North America
  • Home Premium – The version for home users
  • Professional – Mainstream version for business customers
  • Enterprise – For customers who opt to purchase Software Assurance, has bitlocker and other security features
  • Ultimate – For those customers who want every feature available

According to the article, there is supposed to be a natural progression from version to version, as opposed to having some features in some versions and not others at the same level like we saw in Vista. (The example given was Media Centre being available in Vista Home Premium but not Vista Business).

It will be interesting to see what the differences between versions on Windows 7 will be. From the press release, it looks like Bitlocker will only be available to customers who buy Ultimate or purchase Software Assurance and utilize the Enterprise edition of Windows 7. That’s a shame because I think the value of Bitlocker should be available to home users along with businesses. Home users have a need to protect their data just like a company, but I guess I can’t have everything in one version.

The complete plan is located at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2009/feb09/02-03Win7SKU-QA.mspx

 

Technorati Tags: Windows 7

Filed Under: Technology Tagged With: BitLocker, Enterprise, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Security, Starter, Ultimate, Versions, Windows 7

Computer Naming Conventions

posted on February 2, 2009

I am just browsing Slashdot this evening and I see a interesting article on naming conventions. http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/02/2228254

I always find it interesting how people name machines. Some people name their servers based on a theme like cartoon characters or vehicles, ie, Homer, Bart, Maggie, etc. Others will use a scientific approach, like S-NX-MX-01 where the letters will represent type, location, role, and seniority number. I think a case can be made for using both types of naming conventions. Cartoon characters names can be redirected using a CNAME DNS entry so www points to homer or SQL points to Maggie and it gives some freedom to the naming. People also tell me they will use different themes based on location. For example, one lab might be Simpsons, another Star Wars. Draw backs to the arbitrary naming convention is you can’t look at a server and know where it is and what is does. That being said, if using the scientific approach and a machine is moved or re-purposed, you then have to rename for it to make sense. Nothing worst then a machine being moved but not renamed, and then going to look for it.

Myself, I use a little of both types of naming. My workstations are named pretty scientific, they are matched up to a map that sits at the circ desk so patron computer number 12 is named, patron12. My servers are also scientific, but my test lab has all cartoon character names.

No matter what you choose as a naming convention for your machines, the thing is, make it easy to remember for you and document for the next person, in case you win the lottery.

Filed Under: Technology, Web/Tech Tagged With: DNS, Naming, Slashdot

Google Search is Broken

posted on January 31, 2009

 

I was searching this morning when I started to notice warnings that the site I am being directed to might contain malware. I did a news search and sure enough, I am seeing Google Screenshotresults in thailand and on a site called Neowin reporting the same thing.  Here is a screenshot of what I am seeing searching site:google.com. Notice how their entire site might harm your computer. 

This is definitely embarrassing for Google. People can’t use their product, it will drive people to alternative search engines, at least while it is broken. I imagine it will be fixed sometime today but it the meantime, you can use the old standby’s of www.live.com, www.yahoo.com,  or www.altavista.com.

 

Edit: Fixed now at 10:29am EST

Technorati Tags: Google,Search,Malware

Filed Under: Technology, Web/Tech Tagged With: Google, Malware, Search

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • …
  • 107
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • Office 365 – Creating Custom SKUs
  • Setting a Default Printer in Windows 10
  • Deploying Windows to the Correct Drive in Configuration Manager
  • Surface Pro 4, Surface Dock and DVI Problems
  • Enabling UEV in Windows 10 1607

Recent Comments

  • Moore Details on Setting up a Delayed Charge in Quickbooks Online
  • MCP Exam Training on Using PowerShell to Get a List of Groups from Active Directory
  • Kac on Setting up an Office 2010 KMS Host Server
  • prabumedia.com | Pilih lisensi MAK atau MKS untuk aktifasi produk Microsoft ? on Setting up a KMS Server
  • prabumedia.com | Pilih lisensi MAK atau MKS untuk aktifasi produk Microsoft ? on Setting up an Office 2010 KMS Host Server

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org